In 
this article by Ian Jukes of The 21st Century Fluency Project, he discusses the role of technology in the classroom. The phrase that stuck out at me was: "Because the most powerful technology in the classroom was, is and will  remain...a classroom teacher. But not just any classroom teacher - it  has to be a classroom teacher with a love of learning, an appreciation  of the aesthetic, the esoteric, the ethical, and the moral - a teacher  who understands Bloom and Gardner."
I have had discussions with  people and read articles saying that we need to switch to a educational  system based around ideas such as the Kahn Academy, in which learning is  a very individualized, self-motivated, "high-tech" path, all but  getting rid of physical classrooms, if not teachers. 
I agree to a certain extent, and I love sites like the Kahn Academy,  but the problem is that the only students that will really benefit from  this method are those who are self-motivated, genuinely curious  learners in the first place, the rest would not suddenly start to care  about, say, Algebra just because its now on a computer screen. 
So I agree with this article to a certain extent in the same manner;  yes, I think that the younger generations do have a certain intuitive  link with computers, the internet, and technology, and yes I agree that  not only should schools be trying to utilize these tools to their  advantage, but that it is inevitable that schools will naturally have to  change technologically in this direction just like every other industry  on the planet. We should absolutely be educating our students to be  technologically savvy to be able to lead the way in the ever globally  connected world. On the other hand, I sometimes think that articles like  this one can sound a bit exaggerated in that I dont know that  technology will suddenly make a higher % of students more interested in  learning, because this problem of lack of self-motivation and caring  about school has existed long before 20 or so years ago. This % of  students, I would have to guess, wont be a drastically different % in a  classroom loaded to the brim with technology - though I do believe  technology implementation definitely does have a positive effect, if  any, I think its more than anything the quality of teacher that matters  more at inspiring students.
I do not necessarily think that children in America, on average,  seem to be declining in motivation, inspiration, creativity,  intelligence, or curiosity relative to the general American populace of  any age, nor that they are so ADD or electronically "rewired" that they  need to be surrounded by the stuff in order to learn. I do, however, see  this trend becoming a growing problem in our society in general, not  just in children who are growing up with it. This problem is more  complex than I care to go into.
What has seemed fascinating to me is putting our education system  into historical relevance, and I havent heard too many people doing  that. Correct me if Im wrong, but the last century or two have been a  significant historical aberration in regard to to % of educated  populace. Before that, it was only a very small % that were fortunate  enough to have an education as we know it available to them, and now its  not only available, but mandatory, in our country! This is a great  thing, but we forget how new this experiment is. I imagine (though just  guessing) that those who did receive an education more than a couple  centuries ago, would be comparable to our modern classroom's most  self-motivated, interested learners.
So now we are faced with the challenge of educating the entire  populace - and in an exponentially ever-changing technological world.  Keeping up with all the tech is absolutely positive and unavoidable, but  it doesnt erase more complex underlying social problems, and it doesnt  trump what I believe to be the 2 greatest factors: an inspirational,  creative, understanding, intelligent teacher and as small class sizes as  possible.
So for SASIC, I think we are doing a great job with infusing  technology, and we have some really awesome teachers, and have an  atmosphere of creativity and room for the students to become inspired,  and stretch their legs out, so to speak. So I think we should keep up  the great work, and try to keep in mind that inspiring the students to  want to learn throughout their lives, be constantly curious, and express  their creativity constructively are the best gifts we can give to them  and to our society, species.